A QUICK SUMMARY – FOR THE BUSY ONES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
To deliver new features and improvements quickly, it’s essential to have a clear understanding of how long it takes for changes to be deployed from development to production. This is where Lead Time for Changes (LTFC) comes in. Let’s explore how improving LTFC can help software development teams improve their performance.
Lead Time for Changes is a software development metric that measures the time it takes to implement a code change from the moment it is requested until it is deployed into production. This metric includes all the necessary steps for the change to be implemented, such as code review, testing, and deployment.
In other words, Lead Time for Changes measures the speed at which changes are delivered from idea to production.
The metric helps teams to identify bottlenecks and optimize their development processes for faster and more efficient code releases. Additionally, it can be used to set realistic expectations and make informed decisions regarding timelines for feature delivery and project completion.
A low Lead Time for Changes helps to reduce waste and optimize the software delivery process. By identifying and eliminating bottlenecks, you can work more efficiently and reduce the amount of time and resources required to deliver new features.
Additionally, a low Lead Time for Changes can help you to better manage risk by enabling more frequent and smaller releases. This allows for faster feedback and testing, which in turn mitigates the risk of releasing major bugs or issues.
Measuring and improving Lead Time for Changes is a key driver for improving software delivery performance:
Measuring Lead Time for Changes allows you to identify and address issues more quickly, leading to faster feedback loops and a more responsive development process.
You can spot areas for improvement in your development process and make data-driven decisions to optimize the workflow and achieve continuous improvement.
You reduce the costs associated with development, testing, and deployment, as well as reduce the risks of delayed releases and missed deadlines.
Faster Lead Time for Changes means that features and updates can be delivered to customers more quickly, improving customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Delivering high-quality features and updates faster than your competitors, gives you a significant competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Like any metric, Lead Time for Changes has its limitations. Here are some of them to keep in mind:
While Lead Time for Changes can provide valuable insights into software delivery performance, it's important to remember that it's just one metric. You should avoid focusing too narrowly on it to the exclusion of others, as this could lead to missing important insights into their development process.
Measuring Lead Time for Changes accurately can be challenging, especially if you don't have consistent processes in place for tracking when work begins and ends.
Lead Time for Changes can tell you how long it takes to deliver a change, but it doesn't provide much context about the quality of the change or the overall impact it has on the software.
Different teams may have different development processes, tooling, and levels of expertise, which can make it difficult to compare lead times between teams.
It's important to approach this metric with the right mindset.
Don’t use Lead Time for Changes as the sole measure of success. Use it as a starting point for further investigation into your team's development process.
Rather than focusing on individual data points, look for trends in your Lead Time for Changes over time. Are your lead times getting longer or shorter? Are there certain types of changes that consistently take longer than others? These trends can help you identify areas for improvement.
Lead Time for Changes can be influenced by many factors, including team size, development processes, and tooling. If you see a spike in lead time, don't just assume that it's due to a problem with your team. Take the time to investigate the root cause of the issue.
Lead Time for Changes is just one metric in a larger set of software delivery performance metrics. Use it in combination with other metrics, such as MTTR or deployment frequency, to get a more complete picture of your team's performance.
While Lead Time for Changes is an important metric, it's crucial to remember that software development is a complex process that involves people as well as tools and processes. Don't lose sight of the human element when interpreting your Lead Time for Changes data.
Lead Time for Changes can be calculated by measuring the time from when a change is requested or identified to the time when it is delivered to production. Here are the steps to calculate Lead Time for Changes:
It's important to note that Lead Time for Changes can vary depending on the complexity of the change and the processes involved in delivering it to production. Therefore, it's crucial to measure lead time consistently over time to identify trends and improvements.
By analyzing the data, you can identify the changes that require multiple approvals from different teams tend to have longer lead times and may need process improvements to streamline the approval process.
Here are some strategies to maintain a low Lead Time for Changes:
Each handoff in the change process increases the lead time. To maintain low lead times, try to minimize the number of handoffs between teams and departments.
Automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks such as testing, deployment, and provisioning can help you reduce lead times.
Prioritizing changes based on business value and impact ensures that high-value changes are completed quickly.
Standardizing processes and using consistent tools and technologies reduces variability and increases efficiency, resulting in lower lead times.
Ensure clear communication between stakeholders and teams to prevent misunderstandings and delays, which can increase lead times.
By continuously monitoring and analyzing lead time data, you will be able to identify bottlenecks and process improvements that can further reduce lead times.
Some popular alternatives to Lead Time for Changes include cycle time, Time To Restore Service (TTRS), and Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF).
Cycle time measures the time it takes to complete a specific task or process from start to finish. TTRS, on the other hand, focuses on the time it takes to restore service after an incident or outage. Finally, MTBF measures the average time between system failures.
While each metric provides valuable insights into software delivery performance, the choice of metric depends on your specific goals and needs.
By reducing Lead Time for Changes, you can improve software delivery performance and respond more quickly to market demands. However, it is important to measure lead time accurately and avoid common pitfalls such as only focusing on optimizing lead time without considering other factors like quality and efficiency. Explore other software delivery performance metrics discussed in this handbook to get a better understanding.
Every year, Brainhub helps 750,000+ founders, leaders and software engineers make smart tech decisions. We earn that trust by openly sharing our insights based on practical software engineering experience.
Software development enthusiast with 6 years of professional experience in the tech industry.
Top reads this month
Get smarter in engineering and leadership in less than 60 seconds.
Join 300+ founders and engineering leaders, and get a weekly newsletter that takes our CEO 5-6 hours to prepare.
No previous chapters
No next chapters