When not managed properly, technical debt can not only increase development costs. It can result in losing customers and being prone to cyberattacks. Learn how to enter the path of reducing technical debt today to secure your product for the future.
Technical debt is often caused by insufficient information about users' needs, pressure to prioritize release over quality, and not paying enough attention to the code quality.
Technical debt can evoke consequences like losing customers because of poor experience, making a product more vulnerable and less performant, and increasing development costs.
To avoid technical debt, compromise the code quality only when necessary, and remember to always refactor the code according to the plan. Choose your set of preventive metrics like the number of bugs or the number of failed CD and CI.
Technical debt seems like a compromise between faster delivery and high quality.
Often it makes a business and development team more flexible, but the key is to repay the technical debt on time. Otherwise, it can have serious consequences.
Learn how to deal with technical debt and how to prepare preventive processes for the future.
Technical debt (also referred to as code debt) is the consequence of decisions that prioritize speed of delivery and release over the highest quality of the code. It's the implied cost of rework and refactoring in the future that results from choosing an easier solution at the moment.
The term often refers to the cost of incurring and later refactoring the code, not to the code itself.
If you are wondering what is technical debt, and come to think whether it is something like financial debt, you’re right. The term is metaphorically associating software development with financial debt, where interest is extra work one has to do later on for coding quickly now.
Some amount of technical debt is inevitable, and it can be used as a valuable tool when the ultimate quality of the code isn't critical or when time is.
But the intention of repaying technical debt on time is what differs good technical debt from bad one.
For example, Minimum Viable Products most often come with code debt, but it's not a problem as long as the team plans to improve them.
<span class="colorbox1" fs-test-element="box1"><p>A tech debt used properly can give a company more flexibility and improve the execution speed. </p></span>
In search of ways how to deal with technical debt, one could start by answering what type of technical debt is at hand. Because it isn’t only related to coding – it can happen at any development stage.
Bad code, and therefore tech debt, can be produced by skilled programmers who are under pressure. Many IT leaders stick to the 4-type classification of technical debt, proposed by Martin Fowler, a ThoughtWorks Chief Scientist, and Tech Author. He stacks two categories together – reckless/prudent and deliberate/inadvertent, to describe all possible scenarios.
There’s also a simpler version, distinguishing 3 basic types – intentional (a deliberate decision), unintentional (outdated design, new features, etc.), and software entropy (deterioration of performance over time). While the first two of these aren’t too grave, you should, indeed, avoid the latter. You can also break technical debt into design debt, code debt, documentation debt, etc.
Though that’s a conscious debt, or an informed decision if you will, technical debt can also be created unknowingly or unintentionally. Leaving no annotations to the code, old and not addressed bugs, or no automated test, for example.
In most cases, technical debt occurs because a development team needs to meet deadlines. Another problem comes from legacy code and using frameworks and libraries that easily become outdated.
When a team struggles with constant changes, high customer expectations, changing requirements, new cyber threats, and developer turnover - team leaders often struggle with tech debt brought on by that.
Key reasons for technical debt:
Reducing technical debt on time is crucial because accumulated code debt poses a risk not only to a product itself but also to the whole business.
When a technical debt is not properly managed, it can entail financial risks like increased costs and decreased productivity, but also security-related problems decreased usability of a product, and losing customers unsatisfied with software full of bugs.
Technical debt must be paid off in a timely manner and as planned. The more the team postpones it, the harder it is to deal with the problem which creates a domino effect.
Ignored technical debt can bring consequences like:
Technical debt can have a seriously negative influence on business in various ways:
There are several processes and techniques to keep technical debt under control, including:
Managing technical debt has two key aspects – preventing technical debt from accumulating – efforts to identify it, be aware of it and implement certain procedures, and repaying debt – prioritizing, incentivizing quality work, refactoring, etc. Thus, the concept is not all about restraining technical debt from incurring. Start with defining it.
In some cases, refactoring the code will no longer suffice as the technical debt escalated to the point where rewriting the product from scratch is more cost- and effort-effective. In addition, some decades-old enterprise-grade technologies, like C or .NET, are updated every year/couple of years. If your app uses one of the older versions, upgrading to a new one might be your way to reducing the technical debt. In November 2021, Microsoft released .NET 6, which brought critical improvements and will be considered the framework's primary version until November 2024.
<span class="colorbox1" fs-test-element="box1"><p>Thinking of switching to .NET 6?</p><p>Let us know, our .NET 6 experts will be happy to help.</p></span>
The first step is the clear definition and overall awareness about technical debt. In many cases, there is a different understanding by programmers and managers of what is technical debt. Often, debt, changes in code, and adding new features are mixed up. Team meetings or training sessions to discuss technical debt, as well as to work out processes to manage it are good practices.
Train the collective ability to identify technical debt with signs like faulty code, overlapping technologies, bugs of various levels of threat. The definition of “done” should also be understood unanimously, if possible. Regardless is it a planned, unintentional, or unavoidable technical debt you’re dealing with, everyone should grasp the consequences if it is abandoned.
As the team must return at some point to those put aside tasks, it is crucial not to delay it for too long. The time and resources you’ll have to spend for rework equal to the interest in financial debt.
As technical debt has no clear metrics to track it, experts recommend making a list of deferred tasks, informing everyone about it, and scheduling regular times to “pay it off”.
However, you can use metrics like a number of bugs or a number of failed CD and CI.
Inherently close to tracking, there’s an argument for the Agile approach to help deal with technical debt. The Agile environment, with frequent iterations of work, features, and bug fixes delivered, can be an alternative way to manage technical debt. Small chunks of work could help deal with debt in an ongoing manner.
It is sound, of course, to keep a backlog of deferred tasks. To repay the technical debt through the Agile approach, the definition of “done” and test automation might be helpful as well in the long run. Agile teams perceive job “done” as ready for release, which in regards to technical debt means strict supervision.
One other key thing in technical debt prevention – communication, cannot be omitted. Developers and managers should talk frankly and openly, especially because IT managers are also prone to mistakes. It is crucial to include deferred tasks in the next sprints planning, not just in an issue tracker.
You also have to motivate staff to maintain quality work, or even reward it. Measuring the number of delivered features or bugs fixed is just an example of both motivation and tools to tackle technical debt. Such team culture will encourage code reviews, proper testing, mutual help, and good practices.
DevOps culture and environment are helpful in avoiding technical debt. Continuous development, testing, and the integration of operations and development make it harder to ignore technical challenges as well as make decisions and solve problems having the business goals in mind.
When a technical debt grows big, it becomes hard to deal with, slows down your speed to market, and just becomes costly.
There are metrics you can track to detect a growing technical debt on time:
An effective approach to technical debt reduction is crucial.
Moving on to the “repaying” aspect, it might be activities ranging from urgent temporary fixes to refactoring the whole structure of the code. Refactoring is one of the most frequently advised methods of how to deal with technical debt. At some point, it becomes inevitable, in fact, and we’ll get back to it in a moment.
Set procedures and schedules in motion in order not to let technical debt build up. Similar to financial debt, you have to plan pay-off periods to reduce the debt, which means scheduled days or hours when the team is doing the clean-up. A popular practice is doing it piece-by-piece, instead of trying to rid the whole debt at once.
Bottom line: plan, predict, pay.
Another technique for technical debt is testing and code reviews. As critical as testing for the software development process, is a culture of code reviews. No matter how much and how rigorous testing you conduct, an independent fresh look can help spot missed typos, bugs, edge cases, etc.
An integral part here is automated tests. 99% of engineers agree this is the best way to avoid bugs. In essence, automated testing is a bunch of individual tests – as automated scripts, to double-check the code and validate the system in its entirety.
Apropos, one of the universal rules is making legacy code understandable because you’ll get legacy code no matter what. Organized, clean, and apprehendable code will not leave new developers baffled when they get to it months or years later. As “to-do” is a sort of programmers’ inside joke, and different developers have different coding styles, a source control system could be a handy artifact, providing a history of changes and explanations.
And naturally, in some cases, there is no need to repay technical debt. It is simply not worth the effort when debt is related to prototypes, experimental projects, systems approaching termination, or migration from a legacy system to a new one.
Adding a few lines of code here or there to fix a bug or to add a new unplanned feature is a common thing. It then accumulates, your codebase becomes messy and, eventually, you’ll just have to restructure the code to make it orderly.
This is called refactoring, and you’ve probably seen it many times in relation to technical debt. In fact, as soon as the project has been designed and launched, refactoring becomes the only way to reduce technical debt. It can speed things up, though as in any sizeable code there is always a place and reason for refactoring, the key is to do it in the right places.
Often both project managers and developers are reluctant to code refactoring, because, in their words, it doesn’t fix bugs, it is too risky and takes time, or the existing code works fine. So, before doing it, you better get everyone “on the same page” about it. When all recognize the value of refactoring, as well as acknowledge the technical debt, there’s a chance of a positive outcome.
The iterative development approach that lies in the basis of Agile, promotes the quality and helps to maintain it at a consistent level.
Defining "done" as ready to release is one way to increase the code quality.
Also, a Product Owner (or another role that keeps the finger on a pulse of planning the scope of work for a particular sprint) can help a team by reducing the scope of the release, prioritizing, and by that, not compromising quality.
Technical debt isn’t necessarily a bad thing, it just has to be a conscious decision.
Facilitate awareness and accountability about technical debt among team members. Backlog any incomplete or deferred tasks, regardless of type, significance, or development stage – prioritize and complete them. Use tools for visibility and control over technical debt.
And remember that is crucial to track technical debt, plan to repay it, and do it on time.
Become a better tech leader.
Join 200+ CTOs, founders and engineering managers and get weekly bite-sized leadership lessons that take <60 seconds to read.
No previous chapters
No next chapters