5 Tools to Measure Technical Debt [with Features and Drawbacks]

1. SonarQube

SonarQube is an open-source platform used for continuous inspection of code quality. It performs automatic reviews of code to detect bugs, code smells, and security vulnerabilities.

Crucial Features:

• Static code analysis for 27+ programming languages.
• Detection of bugs and vulnerabilities.
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines.
• Quality gate and leak period concepts.

Pricing: 

SonarQube comes in various editions: Community (Free), Developer, Enterprise, and Data Center.

Why to Choose:

• Comprehensive code analysis.
• Supports a wide range of languages.
• Extensive community and plugin ecosystem.

Potential Drawbacks:

• Can be complex to set up and configure.
• May generate false positives.

‍

2. Jira

Jira by Atlassian is a popular issue and project tracking tool, widely used for bug tracking, issue tracking, and project management.

Crucial Features:

• Customizable workflows.
• Scrum and Kanban boards.
• Backlog prioritization and sprint planning.
• Integrations with numerous development tools.

Pricing: 

Offers a free version and paid versions starting at $7/user/month.

Why to Choose:

• Highly customizable.
• Extensive integration capabilities.
• Robust reporting and dashboards.

Potential Drawbacks:

• Can be overwhelming due to its extensive features.
• Configuration and customization can be complex.

‍

3. CAST Highlight

CAST Highlight is a SaaS platform that provides a portfolio-level view of software health by analyzing source code and cloud configurations.

Crucial Features:

• Cloud readiness assessment.
• Open-source risk management.
• Software composition analysis.
• Technical debt estimation.

Pricing:

Pricing is available upon request.

Why to Choose:

• Provides insights into software health and risk.
• Cloud migration and modernization insights.
• Actionable refactoring guidance.

Potential Drawbacks:

• May require training to effectively utilize all features.

‍

4. NDepend

Depend is a static analysis tool for .NET managed code which provides insights into code base quality, technical debt estimation, and code complexity.

Crucial Features:

• Static code analysis.
• Technical debt estimation.
• Code rules and quality gates.
• Dependency visualization.

Pricing: 

Pricing starts at $399 for a single developer license.

Why to Choose:

• Detailed technical debt estimation.
• Integrates with Visual Studio.
• Offers a wide range of metrics.

Potential Drawbacks:

• Only for .NET codebases.
• May have a learning curve for new users.

‍

5. ReSharper

ReSharper by JetBrains is a Visual Studio Extension that helps in code quality analysis, refactoring, and navigation enhancements.

Crucial Features:

• Code quality analysis.
• Code refactoring capabilities.
• Code editing helpers.
• Unit testing assistance.

Pricing: 

Starts at $139/user for the first year.

Why to Choose:

• Robust refactoring tools.
• Supports multiple programming languages.
• Continuous code quality analysis.

Potential Drawbacks:

• Only available for Visual Studio.
• Can be resource-intensive.

1. Maintain software quality

• Prevent Degradation: Technical debt can degrade the quality of the software over time, leading to a decline in performance, reliability, and usability.
• Avoid Bugs: Accumulated technical debt often results in an increased number of bugs and issues, which can affect the user experience.

2. Ensure timely delivery

• Avoid Delays: Technical debt can slow down the development process, leading to delays in feature delivery and product releases.
• Improve Predictability: Tracking technical debt helps in better planning and ensures that timelines are met by avoiding unforeseen issues related to debt.

3. Enhance developer productivity

• Ease of Modification: A codebase with minimal technical debt is easier to modify and add new features to.
• Reduce Friction: Developers can work more efficiently when they are not constantly dealing with the complexities and issues arising from technical debt.

4. Mitigate risks

• Prevent Blockers: Unaddressed technical debt can become a significant blocker in future development or during scaling.
• Security: Technical debt may include outdated libraries or frameworks with known vulnerabilities, posing a security risk.

5. Cost management

• Reduce Costs: Addressing technical debt early is usually less costly than fixing the compounded issues that arise from neglecting it.
• Optimize Resources: Efficient code requires fewer resources to run and maintain, thereby saving costs in the long run.

6. Maintain team morale

• Job Satisfaction: Developers tend to have higher job satisfaction when working with a clean, well-maintained codebase.
• Minimize Burnout: Continuously dealing with issues arising from technical debt can lead to developer burnout and frustration.

7. Ensure scalability

• Adaptability: A codebase with minimal technical debt is more adaptable to changes and can be scaled more easily.
• Incorporate Innovations: It’s easier to incorporate new technologies and innovations into a codebase that isn’t bogged down by technical debt.

8. Customer satisfaction

• Reliable Products: Products with less technical debt are likely to be more reliable and performant, leading to higher customer satisfaction.
• Quick Feature Releases: With less technical debt, new features and improvements can be released more quickly, keeping the product competitive and meeting customer expectations.

9. Strategic planning

• Align with Business Goals: Keeping track of technical debt ensures that the software development is aligned with business goals and strategies.
• Prioritize Work: Knowing the extent and impact of technical debt helps in prioritizing work and allocating resources effectively.